Derivation in Legal English EX 01.4

1. When the head of the aeronautics company landed in the country, he was_____________________ (obligation) to work with the ministry of environmental protection.
2. When he came back from the farm, he met a well-worded _____________________ (injunctive) telling him not to continue work at the site. That is what sparked this confusion.
3. When the lawyer enlightened our director that day, he advised that we could use a _____________________ (prohibit) injunction now although a __________________ (mandate) injunction was also possible.
4. When he reached the meeting, the members were already discussing the case, little did he know that his blood brother was the _____________________ (claim) and that would be the _____________________ (defend).
5. After the court session, the Legal English student went up to the _____________________ (litigation) to understand the court.
6. When the man was dismissed from office, he decided that he was going to_____________________ (defamation) the company. Unfortunately, the venture finally cost him a lot of Money.
7. When the companies began discussing a merger, Africa Aeronautics brought in four US-trained lawyer  to conduct _____________________ (negotiate).
8. I discussed with the lawyer and we agreed that we would pursue the case in the domain of _____________________ (crime) law, and not civil law.
9. The quarrel between the two workers induced the other workers to become nonchalant. This state of affairs ended up in the _____________________ (dismiss) of many innocent workers.
10. The company has agreed that the only way for Mr Adamu to avoid a prison term is for him to make a concrete _____________________ (state) in front of a college of experts.